Monday, August 27, 2007

Could Women Be Better?

Click on the image to enlarge! The information there might not be up to date, but it proves an important point.

Are men really the only ones who can lead this world? What would happen if women were to lead this world? Lets imagine that over 70% of world leaders would be women. Would something change? I think it would.

This proves a point someone made once: "As long as this world is ruled by men, there will be no end to wars!" Women have greater affection and they care much more than men. All women, more or less, become mothers one day and as a mother they tend to be protective and love more. This is why a world led by women could look totally different from one led by men.

There is no fact to suggest that women are not fit to lead. The only thing that makes this hard is our society which is very rigid. For the past millennia women were kept in the dark, kept uneducated, they were dominated by men. Only in the last 100 years did women start to have access to information and education. Still our society, more or less, looks at women like 100 years ago.

It's hard to change something that lasted thousands of years. It seems 100 years is not enough. I believe a world led by women would look much more peacefully and there would be more love between nations and people. No wonder, once, a visitor, from a far away planet, said that advanced civilizations tend to have women in places of power. Men are savage and they tend to "fight" which means war. Women are more inclined to think and not fight.

This is an article wrote by a man. No matter what gender you have, war, should always be something to be avoided, if we need women to lead this world for that to stop, I am all for it.

Peace!

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

US To Attack Iran Within 6 Months!

Fox News asked former CIA field officer Bob Baer on Tuesday whether the US is "gearing up for a military strike on Iran." Baer has written a column for Time indicating that Washington officials expect an attack within the next six months.

"I've taken an informal poll inside the government," Baer told Fox. "The feeling is we will hit the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps." His Time column also suggested that "as long as we have bombers and missiles in the air, we will hit Iran's nuclear facilities."

Baer explained that what his sources anticipate is "not exactly a war." He said the administration is convinced "that the Iranians are interfering in Iraq and the rest of the Gulf" but that "if there is an attack on Iran it would be very quick, it would be a warning."

"We won't see American troops cross the border. If this is going to happen, it's going to happen very quickly and it's going to surprise a lot of people," said Baer. "I hope I'm wrong frankly, but we're going to see."

Source: RawStory

Monday, August 20, 2007

How Propaganda Works!

[How Propaganda Works

by Bob Wallace

"Once you base your whole life striving on a desperate lie,
and try to implement that lie,
you instrument your own undoing."

Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death.

It's not hard to understand how propaganda works. You don't need a college degree, or to even to read any of those thick textbooks everybody hates. Everything relevant can be explained in one not-particularly-long article. And, I guarantee you, you must understand how propaganda targets you, to immunize yourself against the attempts.

Propaganda works by appealing to our most base, animalistic instincts. It does not appeal to our better nature, although one of the purposes of it is to convince us it does. It pretends to appeal to our reason, when in fact it appeals to our most primitive emotions. There is good reason for this: perception travels through the emotional brain first, to the rational brain last.

Specifically, propaganda works by appealing to three things: emotionalism, tribalism and narcissism.

I just mentioned perception travels first to the emotional brain, then the rational brain. This happens to everyone, including people who con themselves they are the most rational and intelligent of intellectuals.

As for tribes, we share with every nearly every animal in the world the instinct to form tribes, arranged in a hierarchy, with a leader. We are group animals. The fact we look to a leader to take care of us is one of the most firmly established principles in psychology (if you don't remember anything else, remember that).

When anyone transgresses the taboos of a tribe, they can, and often are, ostracised or even expelled. An example? Say some people oppose a war. What happens? They are often called cowards and told to leave the country. Who hasn't heard the insult, "You're a coward! If you don't like it here, get out!" People who say such things think they're being patriotic; in reality they're acting like animals. Emotional, irrational, herd animals, prone to the fear and flight activated by propaganda. Individuals think; groups do not, and cannot.

Narcissism is our inborn tendency to see everything as grandiose or devalued, good or bad, with nothing in-between. It's why nearly every tribe in the world -- and nations are just tribes writ large -- called itself "the People," "the Humans," "the Chosen," "the Motherland," "the Fatherland," or "the greatest nation on earth," relegating everyone outside the tribe to a devalued non-people, non-human status (aka "collateral damage"). No wonder it's so easy to kill the outsiders -- they're just not quite human.

When you combine those three concepts, you have the basis for all propaganda. If a leader of a tribe tells the people their goodness is under attack by insane, evil people who want to destroy them, they will react just like animals and attack. The Nazi propagandist Herman Goering noticed all you had to do to get people to march off to war is for the leaders to tell them they were under attack, denounce protesters as traitors exposing the tribe to danger, and the people would slander, ostracize and expel the protesters, and then tramp straight off to be slaughtered. He said this technique worked in every country of the world.

The Bush administration used exactly this technique to start two wars. Essentially they told the public that our goodness was under attack by insane and evil people who wanted to destroy us. See how it works? Tribalism, emotionalism, and narcissism.

Supporter of the war responded by attacking protesters as traitors -- trying to expel them from the tribe -- and marching off to war. It's altogether too simple, and too easy.

One man everyone should know is Edward L. Bernays, the American disciple and nephew of Sigmund Freud. He was for all practical purposes the founder of modern propaganda techniques.

Bernays despised most people and regarded them as his inferiors, especially because of intellectual or social claims. (See how it works? I just appealed to your emotions, and convinced you Bernays was attacking you. You fell for it, right?)

Bernays not only pretty much founded modern propaganda techniques, but was also the father of modern PR. Although, you could say they are same thing, and that there's really no difference between them.

In his 1928 book, Propaganda, Bernays wrote, "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country…"

Remember that quote. Burn it into your memory. Bernays thought people should be ruled by an extremely small elite, who should manipulate them through propaganda. That means you. People who believe in the wonders of government, and that it is their friend, should think twice about it.

In another book, In Crystallizing Public Opinion, Bernays wrote how governments and advertisers can "regiment the mind like the military regiments the body." This can be imposed, he said, because of "the natural inherent flexibility of individual human nature," and suggested the "average citizen is the world's most efficient censor. His own mind is the greatest barrier between him and the facts. His own 'logic-proof compartments,' his own absolutism are the obstacles which prevent him from seeing in terms of experience and thought rather than in terms of group reaction."

Bernays also thought "physical loneliness is a real terror to the gregarious animal, and that association with the herd causes a feeling of security. In man this fear of loneliness creates a desire for identification with the herd in matters of opinion."

Bernays claimed that "the group mind does not think in the strict sense of the word… In making up its mind, its first impulse is usually to follow the example of a trusted leader. This is one of the most firmly established principles in mass psychology." What Bernays called the "regimentation of the mind" is accomplished by taking advantage of the human tendency to self-deception [logic-proof compartments], gregariousness [the herd instinct], individualism [exalting their vanity] and the seductive power of a strong leader.

Bernays also expressed the opinion people "have to take sides...[they] must step out of the audience onto the stage and wrestle as the hero for the victory of good over evil." This also means appealing to our narcissism, our inborn tendency to see everything as either good or bad, with little or nothing in-between.

He also noted the need for people to feel as if they belong to something larger than themselves. Again, this also means appealing to our narcissism, such as people claiming they belong to "the greatest nation on earth."

When people consider themselves as part of the Humans (by whatever name they call themselves), they exalt themselves. Still again, those outside the tribe are non-people, "collateral damage."

"Mental habits create stereotypes just as physical habits create certain definite reflex actionism," Bernays wrote. "...these stereotypes or clichés are not necessarily truthful pictures of what they are supposed to portray." Perception is everything, the truth matters little or not at all.

Now, let's boil all this down and see what we have:

Mass Man, the herd, cannot think, and is instead ruled by its feelings. The herd will look to a leader to save it. The best way to accomplish this is for the herd to feel it is under attack. The herd will draw together, expel those who see the truth and protest, and then march off to war.

The full quote from Hermann Goering? "Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

Tell the herd they are the Humans, or the People, or best of all, have God on their side. Paint their enemies as insane and evil. Again, this is appealing to people's narcissism, the tendency to see everything as either good (us) or evil (them). Evoke paranoia and hysteria in them by convincing them the insane evil ones want to conquer and destroy them. What will happen? You can get them to march off to war by the millions, just as Goering noticed. The truth doesn't matter, only the manipulation of perception.

To make it as simple as possible, everything that is needed for a successful propaganda campaign can be summed up in those three aforementioned words: emotionalism, tribalism and narcissism.

We con ourselves we are so advanced. In reality, the human race is stuck in One Million Years BC, except there's no Raquel Welch in a two-piece fur bikini.

I forgot -- there is one another component to successful propaganda: keep repeating the message over and over.]

Here is a comment to the article that I feel it must be posted:

[Bob forgot one key element.

People inherently don't like to be held accountable for their own actions. Projection is a vital tool. Don't like the way your life has turned out? Blame the [Jews, Muslims, Atheists, religious right, capitalists, communists, Democrats, Republicans, etc].

Blaming others is much more appealing than looking in the mirror and acknowledging that you are the one common component in all of your life's failures.]

Blog Action Day!

I've recently added my blog to the Blog Action Day community! If you have a blog, you should join!What is this all about? Well, here is an excerpt from their website:

On October 15th, bloggers around the web will unite to put a single important issue on everyone’s mind - the environment. Every blogger will post about the environment in their own way and relating to their own topic. Our aim is to get everyone talking towards a better future.

Right now there are over 1.500 blogs that joined which have a reach to an estimated audience of 1 million viewers.

Join us!

Sunday, August 19, 2007

North American Union to Replace USA?

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union.

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union, not between any of these countries.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty?

The North American currency union is a hypothetical situation in which the major countries of North America – specifically Canada and the United States, possibly Mexico – would share a common currency. This idea is based on the common European Union currency, the euro. There are also related proposals for a single currency for all of the Americas. The hypothetical currency for both of these ideas is sometimes referred to as the amero.

Sources: HumanEvents & Wikipedia.

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Danger: Overpopulation!

Overpopulation will kill this planet and us.

We have only two solutions:

1. Reduce the population.
2. Adopt and discover new technologies.

It all comes down to who controls what. In order to have peace on this Earth we need balance when it comes to social classes. The gap between poor and rich is too big. Overpopulation only increases this difference, which in time creates wars between whole nations.

We can't have 300 million Americans living on the back of billions. We are already too many on this planet compared to the technology we have. We can't sustain, in a healthy way, this life we have.

You can't have 1 billion Chinese living like Americans. If Chinese people start living like Americans, I am afraid Americans will start living like Chinese people do now. Power and prosperity will shift, but now grow. This is why unless we discover new technologies to make energy and food out of thin air, we can't have any more people on this Earth.

When shifts happen, wars start. USA will not give up easily. That is why there are rumors about an US-China war. China will take its place. Power and prosperity will shift. That is if China wins. Still, it does not matter who has the power on this planet. As long as that one who has it lives on the back of other nations, like US does now with China, we will never have peace.

What is the solution? Reduce the population so that 1 billion people can all live a decent life. Or discover new technologies which will not depend on fossil fuels. Technologies such as Zero Point Energy. Free energy for the whole world. But this means a loss of power from the elites to the citizens and the people. The elite will not allow such a shift of power.

Coal, Oil and Gas are money and power. Free energy is a danger to those two things. But free energy means peace and a decent life for many people. The elite ruling this planet does not want to lose that power.

Evolution demands those new technologies if we are to progress. But if the elite will not allow it, then this change will be a very ugly one. Many will die. Many wars could start.

Today we are 6.6 billion. In 2025 we can be 9 billion or 1 billion.

9 billion could mean two things:

a) Over 6 billion people live in very poor conditions.
b) New technologies made a difference in this world. Coal, Oil and Gas are history.

1 billion means only one thing:

a) Genocide, World War 3, nuclear holocaust.

You decide the outcome!